This book addresses a largely untouched historical problem: the fourth to fifth centuries AD witnessed remarkably similar patterns of foreign invasion, conquest, and political fragmentation in Rome and China. Yet while the Western Roman Empire was never reestablished, China was reunified at the end of the sixth century. Following a comparative discussion of earlier historiographical and ethnographic traditions in the classical Greco-Roman and Chinese worlds, the book turns to the late antique/early medieval period, when the Western Roman Empire 'fell' and China was reconstituted as a united empire after centuries of foreign conquest and political division. Analyzing the discourse of ethnic identity in the historical texts of this later period, with original translations by the author, the book explores the extent to which notions of Self and Other, of 'barbarian' and 'civilized', help us understand both the transformation of the Roman world as well as the restoration of a unified imperial China.
Randolph B. Ford currently teaches Roman history at the State University of New York, Albany. He has previously taught Roman history, Rome-China comparative history, and Latin language at the University of Notre Dame, Indiana. He obtained his doctorate at New York University's Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, where his dissertation received the Dean's Outstanding Dissertation in the Humanities Award. His research has concentrated on comparative approaches to the study of the Greco-Roman world and ancient China.
Title: Rome, China, and the Barbarians: Ethnographic Traditions and the Transformation of Empires
Author: Ford, Randolph B.
ISBN: 9781108463010
Binding:
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication Date: 2022-06-09
Number of Pages: 389
Weight: 0.5602 kg
'Rome, China, and the Barbarians is a genuinely innovative work ... Highly recommended.' S. M. Burstein, Choice
'... a sweeping and highly informative survey that reaches back to the Homeric and Western Zhou traditions ... painstaking and nuanced analysis ... [Ford's] rich study is doubly rewarding, by showing what sustained comparative approach can accomplish but also how much more remains to be done ... For now, we are very much in [Ford's] debt for unveiling new vistas. Following his lead is bound to be a challenge: collaboration among area specialists will be essential for making this line of research take off.' Walter Scheidel, The Classical Review
'With the comparison of a Greco-Roman and a Chinese historical work from the period of transition between late antiquity and the early middle ages, Ford's work is groundbreaking in comparative studies. This is accomplished on the basis of an impressive double competence in the study of classical antiquity and Sinology and a comprehensive consideration of multilingual secondary scholarship ... the book as a whole represents a remarkable achievement which calls for further research.' Fritz-Heiner Mutschler, Historische Zeitschrift
'... This is a valuable and innovative contribution to the relatively new subfield of Rome-China comparative studies ... Ford writes with admirable clarity ... anyone venturing to [revisit the polemical and political agendas of the Jin shu chronicles and colophons] should now use Ford's fascinating and groundbreaking book as a starting point.' Shao-yun Yang, Journal of Asian Studies
'A sweeping and highly informative survey that reaches back to the Homeric and Western Zhou traditions ... painstaking and nuanced analysis ... [Ford's] rich study is doubly rewarding, by showing what sustained comparative approach can accomplish but also how much more remains to be done ... For now, we are very much in [Ford's] debt for unveiling new vistas. Following his lead is bound to be a challenge: collaboration among area specialists will be essential for making this line of research take off.' Walter Scheidel, The Classical Review
'With the comparison of a Greco-Roman and a Chinese historical work from the period of transition between late antiquity and the early middle ages, Ford's work is groundbreaking in comparative studies. This is accomplished on the basis of an impressive double competence in the study of classical antiquity and Sinology and a comprehensive consideration of multilingual secondary scholarship ... the book as a whole represents a remarkable achievement which calls for further research.' Fritz-Heiner Mutschler, Historische Zeitschrift
