Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become a required element of clinical practice, but it is critical for the healthcare community to understand the ongoing controversy surrounding EBM. Seeking to address questions raised by critics, The Philosophy of Evidence-based Medicine challenges the over dependency of EBM on randomized controlled trials. This book also explores EBM methodology and its relationship with other approaches used in medicine.
Jeremy Howick PhD Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, UK
Title: The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine
Author: Howick, Jeremy H.
ISBN: 9781405196673
Binding:
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Publication Date: 2011-04-05
Number of Pages: 244
Weight: 0.2995 kg
Well-written, concise, engaging. The Evidence-based medicine (from now on 'EBM') movement continues to go from strength to strength, with their hierarchy of medical evidence widely agreed upon and very influential in the theoretical and practical. (The Guardian, 24 January 2014) Review appeared in The Guardian - 24 January 2014 In conclusion, The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine is a must-have as a source of knowledge of and reference to the EBM movement. Howick presents the argument for EBM persuasively whilst giving sufficient coverage to alternative positions. I thoroughly recommend this text as both a 'way in' to the subject and a source of deeper understanding in the latest stage of medicine's fascinating journey, full of twists and turns in the search for the truth. (Economics & Philosophy, 1 January 2014) The book is well structured and makes an accessible and pleasant read. It deserves to be digested not only by philosophers with a methodological bent but by practitioners of EBM. After two decades of criticisms of various aspects of the increasingly popular EBM way of reasoning, it is about time EBM defenders tried to strike back, clarifying and justifying their positions. Howick s book is a valuable effort that will hopefully enrich the continuing debate. (Theoria, 1 April 2013) Jeremy Howick has written the most comprehensive and fair philosophical treatment of EBM to date. Howick understands that EBM is not, first and foremost, a philosophical position, and that its various components (e.g., evidence hierarchies) are not primarily philosophical theses. Rather, they are attempts to improve the efficacy of medicine... The book approaches its topic with the tools of mainstream analytical philosophy of science. (Philosophy of Science, 2013) The Philosophy of Evidence Based Medicine helps answer the question of how to think about medicine so that judgement can be made. The book addresses key questions about medical decision-making, such as: what role should mechanistic reasoning have in determining appropriate medical care? And, what weight, if any, should be given to expert opinions? This isn t a book about how doctors think. It is about how doctors ought to think... The Philosophy of Evidence Based Medicine is an extremely important and practical book about evidence-based medicine, and I consider it to be one of the most important contemporary books on the subject. I recommend it very highly. (The Medical Media Review, 2012) In The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Medicine, Jeremy Howick, PhD offers by far the most fully formed defence to date of the epistemology of EBM... Well-written and as approachable as any work in the philosophy of science might hope to be... Howick is to be commended for his careful analysis of epistemic ramifications of many of the methodologies of clinical epidemiology. (Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2011) Howick's book provides a good overview of EBM's defense of the hierarchy of evidence and an excellent reference list for readers who want to know more about EBM and its critics. (Theory of Medical Bioethics, 2011) Since the 1990s, the practice of medicine has become dominated by a new methodological reasoning process - that of evidence-based medicine. This book unpacks the assumptions inherent in this methodology, shedding light on its contributions and limitations to patient care. It addresses misconceptions about and criticisms of EBM in a cogent manner and provides valuable insight into how the current world of medicine is being shaped. (Doody's, 2011)
